bigcommerce reviews bigcommerce vs shopify shopify themes
  Progressive Ideas in Child Welfare
  • Home
  • About
  • Publications
  • Blog
  • Contact

In Child Welfare Casework, Trust  is Imperative

3/2/2014

2 Comments

 
Can a caseworker, who recognizes that the usual child welfare approach to working with families is ineffective, misses the point and also has little regard for parents' life situations, still provide the kind of assistance that will lead to long-term behavioral change?  Should this caseworker follow accepted practice, all the while blaming the system for its ineptitudes?  Should she just wait till system-wide change occurs?  Or, should she bravely  and independently proceed in the direction that she understands will likely lead to better parenting and to a better life for the families with whom she works?  Can an increasing number of  independent, competent and caring caseworkers not only do better by their clients but also eventually effect large-scale  change?  Since the caseworker's choices are self-evident, though at times fraught with difficulties, let's proceed to discuss ideas that she will find helpful. 

A caseworker wishing to locate a manual or a set of how to instructional books will seek in vain.  If only things were that simple.  The confluence of many variables, unpredictable occurrences, and variance in relational and expressive styles necessitate that a caseworker come with a vast knowledge base and the creative thinking ability to insightfully recognize how best to proceed.

The caseworker and parents first must establish a congenial and trusting relationship.  Because the concept trust has become overused and very often nebulous in its implications, to the point of often being very much a cliché, it is useful to discuss what is meant by trust and when it is and  is not a significant factor in  certain working relationships. The proliferation of silly exercises often used in group settings and mistakenly meant to build trust amongst the participants has only contributed to a less serious view of actual trust and its merits.

Trust, it would seem, pertains to just about every human interaction.  When we go to the grocery we expect that the produce will be fresh.  Students expect a certain level of competence from their instructors.  We expect that the bus driver knows the correct route and will get us to our destination within a reasonable time.  We even come to trust the companion animals with whom we live.  When we first meet someone and begin a relationship the nature of that relationship, as we want it to be, will determine our expectations for trust.  Trust is very much, in part, in the eye of the beholder, and sometimes, also influenced by the context in which the beholder finds herself.

The concept trust, as it relates to the counseling process, can entail two related components,1) trust that the counselor can provide competent help, and 2) trust that can develop between the counselor and client that will allow the expression of private and confidential details within a compassionate and empathic working relationship.      

A person who seeks out and arranges appointments with a counselor may or may not place value on the working relationship itself.  Her expectations may involve only that she and the counselor identify the problem and then work on techniques that will help her manage these difficulties in the future.  Another person, though, may also place importance on the actual working relationship itself.  They both however expect that the counselor can be trusted to provide competent service.  A particular counselor's reputation and prestige can enhance this trust.  Theoreticians differ in their opinions as to the role of trust and of the relationship itself in the counseling process. 

I doubt however that these theoreticians would disagree on the importance of the establishment of a trusting relationship in most child welfare scenarios.  That's because the child welfare client probably did not request the service and not only is it being forced on her, but this intrusion also brings with it the possibility of additional threats.  It is also likely that this client has a negative preconceived idea about caseworkers' interactivity with parents.  

The caseworker's genuine empathic and compassionate mind-set and approach, which seeks to patiently  understand the parent's life situation and the interplay of possible maltreatment, will slowly enable the development of a trusting relationship.   The importance of trust between the parent and caseworker can not be overly stressed.

The parents and caseworker must arrive at an agreement about what issues will be dealt with and to what purpose.  This relationship can not be forced nor false; sincerity on the caseworker's part can be expected to be met with similar genuineness by the parents, though perhaps not from the outset.  This often can be expected to take time to develop.  A time-table, script or list of techniques can not be helpful here.  Every scenario will require somewhat different ways of proceeding.  The varying nature of the maltreatment allegations will possibly necessitate establishment of both short and long-term goals. It will at times be a challenge to deal with the alleged abuse or neglect while simultaneously forging a congenial relationship.  This is in fact something that the caseworker should probably discuss directly with the parents.  Doing so, not only contributes to honest rapport, and an empathic give and take,  but also assures that the parent is fully aware of every aspect of the process, including its difficulties.  Certainly, a flexible mind-set is vital.

Time. A lot of time.  A lot of time may be necessary for this to transpire.  

There can be no presumption that mental health issues have been a factor in the maltreatment.  In fact, there probably should also be no presumption that any maltreatment actually occurred, investigative conclusions notwithstanding.  This may not apply 100% of the time but usually where firm evidence is lacking, the caseworker herself will need to determine the veracity of any allegations.  As the caseworker gets to know the parents she will slowly begin to understand what has transpired and the nature of any possible abuse or neglect.  When maltreatment indeed has occurred, unless there is evidence of seriously disturbed thought patterns connected to the abuse or neglect, no attribution of mental illness should be assumed. 

Sometimes it can be difficult to determine if abuse or neglect, as officially defined, has occurred.  Usually, a pattern, rather than a one-time occurrence, can begin to clarify the nature of the allegations. 

Parents can not be expected to initially welcome into their home representatives of a system that is seen as all powerful and with the potential to remove one's children and to forcibly demand adherence to unfamiliar and seemingly threatening expectations.  But a caseworker with a compassionate mind-set who persistently works on developing an ongoing congenial, respectful and constructive relationship with the parents will usually find that this threat will recede as time goes on.  Constructive relationship refers to the parents' belief and understanding that a purpose exists in this relationship and that they and their children will benefit from it. 

Some parents may not only readily welcome the child welfare caseworker into their home but may also anxiously and enthusiastically wish to work toward positive behavioral change.

Through patient and continuous discussion between parents and caseworker the parents' thoughts and ideas about the maltreatment, about its place in their family life and about its antecedents will begin to emerge.

In future blog articles we will discuss some specific issues regarding assisting parents with their aspirations for a more satisfying life and ideas about helpful parent education.    
 
 



     

 
 


      
2 Comments
Francine
3/2/2014 09:42:28 pm

It is so difficult to establish a positive, trusting relationship in such an adversarial setting but you are so right when you say the key is time and consistency. Unfortunately these two elements are often lacking in a system that pushes for goals to be quickly met and caseworkers are so often overwhelmed by sheer numbers. But they need to keep working on this!

Reply
Sidney Goldberg
3/3/2014 10:42:42 am

I say at the very outset of this blog article that we will be discussing how an independently acting caseworker will proceed to work with families in ways that differ from the typical child welfare approach. This means that the caseworker will find a way to devote sufficient time even when official protocol seems to mandate a rush job. Additionally, these days caseworkers usually are not burdened by huge caseloads of 100 or more families, as was the situation years ago. It is possible to work competently with families even when the system tugs in opposite directions. I speak from experience when I say this.

Reply



Leave a Reply.

    Progressive Ideas in Child Welfare

    Progressive Ideas in Child Welfare aims to put forward, through thoughtful discussion, new ways of looking at the many complexities that confront families involved in the child welfare system.  This discussion will generate broader insights necessary to facilitating real and substantial change.

    Archives

    November 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed


Picture
Website by J2 Design NYC

BACK TO TOP

Website Design by J2 Design NYC